In my Thing two weeks ago I spent some time specifically addressing the rising tide of ugliness and impending violence associated with the backlash to declarative gender theory.
In my Thing two weeks ago I spent some time specifically addressing the rising tide of ugliness and impending violence associated with the backlash to declarative gender theory.
The response has been... interesting. I'd invite your input, if you'd care to give it, as a welcome bit of thought diversity on the matter.
This article has motivated med to accelerate my readthrough of Monsters.
Also, much as I will feel some sheepish guilt at soiling the exurbs of this beautiful piece, the section on the ontology of "buggery" was drowned out in my mind for several read-throughs by a witticism I learned in maybe 6th grade:
"If you build a thousand bridges and suck one dick, you're not a bridge builder, you're a cocksucker."
"And it sure is convenient for the Epsteins and the Bankman-Frieds of the world, who we would never be able to chase down the street and lynch on a normal day, to have a nice visible group of people for us to turn our rage on instead."
and also this:
"The promotion of pedophilia is coming from the woke, postmodern, socially-destructive left, most of them also followers of the agenda of globalist technocracy. Some of them may also be LGBT- many probably just think they are because their identities are so insubstantial and polluted that they’d identify as anything that might give them more meaning or attention or the simulation of love. Most of them aren’t. Epstein sure wasn’t LGBT, nor were the vast majority of his known affiliates."
There are absolutely a few complete fucking idiots who live their entire lives online who've argued for "liberating" children into sexuality. They all mostly have anime characters as their twitter photo and rarely talk about anything that doesn't happen on a computer, and that's the connection. Live most of your life believing other people and especially children are just pixels and it's easy to come up with ideas about how to treat them as such.
On the other hand, it's worth mentioning that the new satanic panic about pedophiles hiding in your cereal box is currently limited to the US and a tiny bit in the UK. In both places, "our children" function in the mind the way that "our women" do in French and German culture or "our foreskins" did in medieval European culture as the sacred object all the jealous evil barbarians were trying to steal. When people are experiencing societal chaos and instability, it's bizarrely comforting to imagine you have something everyone else is trying to take from you and corrupt.
In my Thing two weeks ago I spent some time specifically addressing the rising tide of ugliness and impending violence associated with the backlash to declarative gender theory.
https://guttermouth.substack.com/p/tiws-day-thing-112922
The response has been... interesting. I'd invite your input, if you'd care to give it, as a welcome bit of thought diversity on the matter.
This article has motivated med to accelerate my readthrough of Monsters.
Also, much as I will feel some sheepish guilt at soiling the exurbs of this beautiful piece, the section on the ontology of "buggery" was drowned out in my mind for several read-throughs by a witticism I learned in maybe 6th grade:
"If you build a thousand bridges and suck one dick, you're not a bridge builder, you're a cocksucker."
Jumped in with:
I think this is a good summation:
"And it sure is convenient for the Epsteins and the Bankman-Frieds of the world, who we would never be able to chase down the street and lynch on a normal day, to have a nice visible group of people for us to turn our rage on instead."
and also this:
"The promotion of pedophilia is coming from the woke, postmodern, socially-destructive left, most of them also followers of the agenda of globalist technocracy. Some of them may also be LGBT- many probably just think they are because their identities are so insubstantial and polluted that they’d identify as anything that might give them more meaning or attention or the simulation of love. Most of them aren’t. Epstein sure wasn’t LGBT, nor were the vast majority of his known affiliates."
There are absolutely a few complete fucking idiots who live their entire lives online who've argued for "liberating" children into sexuality. They all mostly have anime characters as their twitter photo and rarely talk about anything that doesn't happen on a computer, and that's the connection. Live most of your life believing other people and especially children are just pixels and it's easy to come up with ideas about how to treat them as such.
On the other hand, it's worth mentioning that the new satanic panic about pedophiles hiding in your cereal box is currently limited to the US and a tiny bit in the UK. In both places, "our children" function in the mind the way that "our women" do in French and German culture or "our foreskins" did in medieval European culture as the sacred object all the jealous evil barbarians were trying to steal. When people are experiencing societal chaos and instability, it's bizarrely comforting to imagine you have something everyone else is trying to take from you and corrupt.
Much appreciated.