I ran across someone explaining how your critical stance on pornography should have been an "obvious" sign to everyone that Scarlet Imprint was a fascist project.
This, and "I never would have bought their books anyway they're trash" seems to be typical of the deepest level of critique directed at your analysis.
So I think you shouldn't worry too much. Llewellyn anyway has that market locked down.
I ran across someone explaining how your critical stance on pornography should have been an "obvious" sign to everyone that Scarlet Imprint was a fascist project.
This, and "I never would have bought their books anyway they're trash" seems to be typical of the deepest level of critique directed at your analysis.
So I think you shouldn't worry too much. Llewellyn anyway has that market locked down.
I ran across someone explaining how your critical stance on pornography should have been an "obvious" sign to everyone that Scarlet Imprint was a fascist project.
This, and "I never would have bought their books anyway they're trash" seems to be typical of the deepest level of critique directed at your analysis.
So I think you shouldn't worry too much. Llewellyn anyway has that market locked down.
Any deviation from the catechism is heresyтАж
If people think porn is a net benefit with no cost, they are truly incapable of critical thought.
Keeping the Llewellyn readers out of our readership is a great way to insure quality control.